Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama

Sydney, June 1 - A New South Wales court upheld a decision that ruled that news outlets can be held responsible as publishers of allegedly defama